Burning candle wick

Food for thought for discussions
on the issue of the face-veil (niqab)

JIMAS lilac logo
ABOUT US HISTORY ACTIVITIES HELP US HOME

Est. 1984 - 2007
Contact

 

Niqab

ARTICLE ONE

ARTICLE TWO

ARTICLE THREE

 

  ISLAM

  OUR PUBLICATIONS

  AUDIO/VIDEO

  PAST EVENTS

  CONFERENCE 2007

  CURRENT EVENT

  CHARITY

 

 

An article by Rev. Clifford Smith, a Christian minister,
on the issue of the face-veil

blood red water

WHAT [NOT] TO WEAR: CLOTHES & FAITH

Throughout history people have used clothing to say something about their religious beliefs and allegiances - even if it is nothing more than a badge, a pendant or a 'logo' on a sweatshirt. In a free society the right to do this should be inviolable, although there may be times when it is inadvisable or inappropriate for reasons of courtesy, personal safety or public order. A deliberately provocative, 'in your face' approach is unlikely to serve any good purpose. And there will also be times when particular types of clothing are simply impractical. A symbol dangling on a chain or a loose-fitting garment may well be dangerous around machinery, for example. And in situations requiring a face-to-face encounter - for reasons of recognition, security, identification, trust-building and effective communication - a garment that partially or wholly conceals the face might also come in this category.

It is this issue that has dominated debate in recent weeks, and a pretty poor debate it has been too! What started out as a minor local issue, that was surely amenable to an amicable local solution, became inflated out of all proportion. On one side we had ill-advised government ministers weighing in with clumsy and counter-productive remarks aimed at one young Muslim woman - cheered on by sections of the media. On the other we had certain self-appointed Muslim 'leaders' who are regrettably prone to take offence at every conceivable opportunity. Debate - I would prefer conversation - should be informed and undertaken with goodwill and a cool head. I don't think that any reasonable or responsible person wants issues like this to divide communities and foster ill-will, so maybe we should all just think twice before shooting our mouths off.

I don't want to comment further on the affair in question, but maybe it's worth saying something about 'Muslim dress'. And the first thing to say about it is that, strictly speaking, there is no such thing. Neither the Qur'an nor the Muslim faith in general prescribes or proscribes the wearing of any particular garment, either for men or for women, except while on the Haj - the Pilgrimage to Mecca. All the various garments that are called 'Muslim dress' are simply the various culturally-determined interpretations of what the Qur'an actually says about clothing - which isn't very much. It is perfectly possible to use 'Western' clothing in ways acceptable to Qur'anic teaching - as many Muslim women (and many more Muslim men) actually do.

What the Qur'an says about clothing is, basically, that it should be modest. Large expanses of naked flesh, skin-tight garments and ostentatious jewellery are out as far as appearance in public is concerned (what you wear in private is another matter), but there is no requirement to veil the face - in whole or in part. I have no Arabic, but I do have six different translations of the Qur'an, along with several books on Islam by Muslim authors, and they all seem agreed on this point! To quote one translation, the two principal Qur'anic passages on the matter say:

'O Prophet, tell your wives and daughters, and believers' wives as well, to draw their cloaks around themselves. That is more appropriate so that they may be recognized and not molested.' (Sura 33: 59)

'Tell believers to avert their glances and to guard their private parts; that is purer for them. God is informed about anything they do. Tell believing women to avert their glances and guard their private parts, and not display their charms except what normally appears of them. They should fold their shawls over their bosoms and show their charms only to their husbands, or their fathers or their fathers-in-law…' [There follows an extensive list of male relatives, 'womenfolk' and others likely to be encountered in the home or other private settings.] (Sura 24: 30-31)

The reason for the dress code is thus modesty and, particularly for women, safety. But the injunction to 'avert' one's glances shouldn't be forgotten either: modesty also applies to the eye of the beholder, regardless of gender! There is an echo here of those challenging words of Jesus: 'If a man looks at a woman with a lustful eye, he has already committed adultery with her in his heart' (Matthew 5: 28). The modesty in dress required by Islam is thus also intended to protect us from ourselves by minimising temptation. Bearing in mind the number of young women who drink too much and wear too little on our streets at weekends, it makes you wonder why one young Muslim woman going to the other extreme should cause such a fuss!

But why do some Muslim women opt for the full 'veil' and cover their faces when this is not a requirement of Islam? For some it is a personal choice freely undertaken as an expression of their deep devotion to God, and so must be respected. For others it may be an assertion more of Muslim identity than of spirituality, even of defiance, in a situation where they feel that identity to be under attack. This is more problematical, and needs sensitive handling. For others still it may simply be a matter of custom brought from elsewhere. But there is a more disturbing aspect that can't be ignored or dismissed. In some parts of the Muslim world the wearing of the full 'veil' is not a matter of personal choice but of compulsion, and any woman not conforming to this extreme interpretation of the dress code is liable to be punished, attacked and even killed by fanatical so-called 'fundamentalists'. That is unacceptable by the standards of any moral code, including that of Islam, and it should certainly not be tolerated here, should it occur.

Personally, I find no problem whatsoever with the clothes worn by most Muslim women in this country - increasing numbers of whom are English converts, incidentally. None of those outfits, in themselves, constitute 'Muslim dress', though. They simply comply with the broad guidelines set out in the Qur'an. As for covering the face, this may not have originated in Islam at all! One suggestion - from a Muslim source - is that it originated in either high-caste Hindu or Persian Christian circles to shield the faces of noblewomen from the gaze of the common people! I can't comment on that, but I do think that we should all exercise a bit of tolerance and common sense in matters both of faith and of clothing!

chairs on a late evening field
 
Last Updated: March 2007
Review date: December 2007